Which of the following best describes the principle of "specific performance" in contract law?

Prepare for the Texas Contract Law Exam. Study with engaging multiple choice questions, each with explanations. Get ready to excel in your Texas Contract Law Exam!

Specific performance is a legal remedy that compels a party to execute the terms of a contract as agreed upon, rather than simply offering monetary compensation for a breach of contract. This principle is particularly applicable in situations where the subject matter of the contract is unique or where monetary damages would not suffice to remedy the harm caused by a breach. For instance, in cases involving real estate transactions, specific performance ensures that a buyer can enforce the purchase agreement and actually acquire the property they contracted for, because each piece of property is unique and cannot simply be replaced by money.

The other options do not accurately describe specific performance. A monetary compensation remedy is contrastingly known as "damages," and it does not fulfill the specific contractual obligations in the event of a breach. The idea of nullifying a contract pertains to rescission, which is a different legal concept altogether. Altering the terms of an agreement refers to contract modification, which again is not related to the enforcement of existing obligations. Thus, the best description of specific performance is that it is a remedy requiring one party to fulfill their contractual obligations.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy