What is the consequence of failing to comply with the "mirror image" rule in Texas?

In Texas contract law, the "mirror image" rule states that an acceptance must exactly match the terms of the offer in order to create a binding contract. If the acceptance alters the terms or introduces new terms, it is not considered a valid acceptance but rather a counteroffer. This counteroffer essentially rejects the original offer and creates a new proposal for the original offeror to consider.

So, when an acceptance fails to comply with the mirror image rule, the consequence is that it is treated as a counteroffer. This means that the original offer no longer stands, and the parties are in a state of negotiation regarding the new terms proposed by the counteroffer. Understanding this principle is crucial in contract formation because it illustrates how precision in acceptance is necessary to establish a legally binding agreement.

The other options relate to consequences not accurate to the scenario: the automatic revocation of the offer does not occur, the contract cannot remain valid if the acceptance is not in accordance with the offer, and there is no requirement for renegotiation; the original offeror can simply accept or reject the counteroffer.