Under Texas law, which of the following can make a contract voidable?

A contract can be declared voidable when one party was induced to enter the contract through fraudulent misrepresentation. In Texas law, a party who has been the victim of fraud has the right to either void the contract or affirm it. Fraudulent misrepresentation occurs when one party knowingly makes a false statement or representation with the intent to deceive another party, who relies on that representation when entering into the contract. Because of this reliance, the defrauded party may seek legal remedies, which include voiding the contract altogether.

Emotional decisions typically do not constitute a legal basis for voiding a contract. Similarly, unilateral mistakes—where one party is mistaken about a fact or term—may not render the contract voidable unless the other party had reason to know of the mistake and it was significant. Additionally, failing to meet legitimate expectations is usually a matter of breach or non-performance rather than a reason to declare a contract voidable. Therefore, fraudulent misrepresentation is the clear basis for making a contract voidable under Texas law.